A11Y-USER-001-WORKED-001: representative worked example
Context: Representative synthetic example for Inclusive recruitment and support-needs sampling on a fictional, version-frozen product target; no client or participant execution occurred.
Inspected: The tester follows S2 (Record the approved research and consent plan) using the target, required state, tool and repeat rule stated in this procedure.
Observed output: After the tester completes the Inclusive recruitment and support-needs sampling scenario named Record the approved research and consent plan, the recorded observation for the target is inconsistent with the required result: The session is authorised, ethical, accessible and cannot be misreported as a technical conformance verdict.
Evidence:
- example-evidence-001: target and state record for The study process and records relevant to Inclusive recruitment and support-needs sampling.
- example-evidence-002: contemporaneous observation from the named method — Objective, relevant participant characteristics, recruitment, accessible consent, tasks, facilitation, privacy and retention.
- example-evidence-003: comparison note linking the actual observation to the expected result and claim boundary
Tester reasoning: The recorded observation does not demonstrate the expected result: The session is authorised, ethical, accessible and cannot be misreported as a technical conformance verdict. The failed decision is limited to this synthetic target and state; unexecuted coverage is not inferred.
Decision: failed
Finding: A11Y-USER-001-example-finding-001 — Inclusive recruitment and support-needs sampling: expected result is not demonstrated. The represented barrier may affect Participants represented by the study and product teams responsible for acting on observed barriers.
Remediation: Change the represented target or process so it demonstrates this result: The session is authorised, ethical, accessible and cannot be misreported as a technical conformance verdict. Then rerun the affected step and every dependent variation.
Reviewer feedback: The reviewer confirms applicability, environment, actual-versus-expected comparison, evidence references and bounded wording; unsupported product-wide or conformance language is removed.
Final client wording: Synthetic training finding: the sampled Inclusive recruitment and support-needs sampling target does not meet the procedure expectation in the recorded state. User impact and broader scope require evidence from the buyer's real execution.
Retest: Synthetic retest example: after the represented change, repeat the failed step plus material error and recovery states. Close the finding only when new evidence demonstrates the expected result; otherwise retain the non-pass outcome.
Boundary: This is a representative, synthetic worked example for training and calibration. It is not evidence from a client product, participant or real assistive-technology execution.