A11Y-WCAG-044-WORKED-001: representative worked example
Context: Representative synthetic example for WCAG 3.2.2 On Input on a fictional, version-frozen product target; no client or participant execution occurred.
Inspected: The tester follows S2 (Warn before context changes caused by input) using the target, required state, tool and repeat rule stated in this procedure.
Observed output: After the tester completes the WCAG 3.2.2 On Input scenario named Warn before context changes caused by input, the recorded observation for the target is inconsistent with the required result: Changing a setting does not automatically change context unless users were advised before using the component.
Evidence:
- example-evidence-001: target and state record for Each setting change in a user-interface component that can automatically change context.
- example-evidence-002: contemporaneous observation from the named method — Component/setting, prior advice, action, resulting context and focus/data effect.
- example-evidence-003: comparison note linking the actual observation to the expected result and claim boundary
Tester reasoning: The recorded observation does not demonstrate the expected result: Changing a setting does not automatically change context unless users were advised before using the component. The failed decision is limited to this synthetic target and state; unexecuted coverage is not inferred.
Decision: failed
Finding: A11Y-WCAG-044-example-finding-001 — Warn before context changes caused by input: expected result is not demonstrated. The represented barrier may affect People who use keyboards, switches, speech input or adapted pointing devices.; Blind people and people using screen readers or braille.; People with cognitive, language, learning or memory disabilities.
Remediation: Change the represented target or process so it demonstrates this result: Changing a setting does not automatically change context unless users were advised before using the component. Then rerun the affected step and every dependent variation.
Reviewer feedback: The reviewer confirms applicability, environment, actual-versus-expected comparison, evidence references and bounded wording; unsupported product-wide or conformance language is removed.
Final client wording: Synthetic training finding: the sampled Warn before context changes caused by input target does not meet the procedure expectation in the recorded state. User impact and broader scope require evidence from the buyer's real execution.
Retest: Synthetic retest example: after the represented change, repeat the failed step plus material error and recovery states. Close the finding only when new evidence demonstrates the expected result; otherwise retain the non-pass outcome.
Boundary: This is a representative, synthetic worked example for training and calibration. It is not evidence from a client product, participant or real assistive-technology execution.