A11Y-WCAG-012-WORKED-001: representative worked example
Context: Representative synthetic example for WCAG 1.4.1 Use of Color on a fictional, version-frozen product target; no client or participant execution occurred.
Inspected: The tester follows S2 (Use more than colour to convey meaning) using the target, required state, tool and repeat rule stated in this procedure.
Observed output: After the tester completes the WCAG 1.4.1 Use of Color scenario named Use more than colour to convey meaning, the recorded observation for the target is inconsistent with the required result: Colour is not the only visual means of conveying the target information or distinction.
Evidence:
- example-evidence-001: target and state record for Each use of colour that conveys information, indicates an action, prompts a response or distinguishes a visual element.
- example-evidence-002: contemporaneous observation from the named method — Target/state, colour meaning, non-colour visual cue, screenshots and interaction result.
- example-evidence-003: comparison note linking the actual observation to the expected result and claim boundary
Tester reasoning: The recorded observation does not demonstrate the expected result: Colour is not the only visual means of conveying the target information or distinction. The failed decision is limited to this synthetic target and state; unexecuted coverage is not inferred.
Decision: failed
Finding: A11Y-WCAG-012-example-finding-001 — Use more than colour to convey meaning: expected result is not demonstrated. The represented barrier may affect People with low vision or reduced contrast sensitivity.; People with colour-vision differences or monochrome displays.
Remediation: Change the represented target or process so it demonstrates this result: Colour is not the only visual means of conveying the target information or distinction. Then rerun the affected step and every dependent variation.
Reviewer feedback: The reviewer confirms applicability, environment, actual-versus-expected comparison, evidence references and bounded wording; unsupported product-wide or conformance language is removed.
Final client wording: Synthetic training finding: the sampled Use more than colour to convey meaning target does not meet the procedure expectation in the recorded state. User impact and broader scope require evidence from the buyer's real execution.
Retest: Synthetic retest example: after the represented change, repeat the failed step plus material error and recovery states. Close the finding only when new evidence demonstrates the expected result; otherwise retain the non-pass outcome.
Boundary: This is a representative, synthetic worked example for training and calibration. It is not evidence from a client product, participant or real assistive-technology execution.