A11Y-DRGN-006-WORKED-001: representative worked example
Context: Representative synthetic example for Dragon duplicate and ambiguous controls on a fictional, version-frozen product target; no client or participant execution occurred.
Inspected: The tester follows S2 (Disambiguate repeated visible labels) using the target, required state, tool and repeat rule stated in this procedure.
Observed output: After the tester completes the Dragon duplicate and ambiguous controls scenario named Disambiguate repeated visible labels, the recorded observation for the target is inconsistent with the required result: The intended repeated control can be selected reliably using its visible label and documented multiple-match disambiguation; no wrong action or MouseGrid/pointer fallback occurs.
Evidence:
- example-evidence-001: target and state record for The selected controls, text entry and task states relevant to Dragon duplicate and ambiguous controls.
- example-evidence-002: contemporaneous observation from the named method — Recognised command, intended target, actual target, focus/state and recognition correction.
- example-evidence-003: comparison note linking the actual observation to the expected result and claim boundary
Tester reasoning: The recorded observation does not demonstrate the expected result: The intended repeated control can be selected reliably using its visible label and documented multiple-match disambiguation; no wrong action or MouseGrid/pointer fallback occurs. The failed decision is limited to this synthetic target and state; unexecuted coverage is not inferred.
Decision: failed
Finding: A11Y-DRGN-006-example-finding-001 — Dragon duplicate and ambiguous controls: expected result is not demonstrated. The represented barrier may affect People who use speech recognition because mouse, touch or sustained keyboard input is difficult or unavailable.
Remediation: Change the represented target or process so it demonstrates this result: The intended repeated control can be selected reliably using its visible label and documented multiple-match disambiguation; no wrong action or MouseGrid/pointer fallback occurs. Then rerun the affected step and every dependent variation.
Reviewer feedback: The reviewer confirms applicability, environment, actual-versus-expected comparison, evidence references and bounded wording; unsupported product-wide or conformance language is removed.
Final client wording: Synthetic training finding: the sampled Dragon duplicate and ambiguous controls target does not meet the procedure expectation in the recorded state. User impact and broader scope require evidence from the buyer's real execution.
Retest: Synthetic retest example: after the represented change, repeat the failed step plus material error and recovery states. Close the finding only when new evidence demonstrates the expected result; otherwise retain the non-pass outcome.
Boundary: This is a representative, synthetic worked example for training and calibration. It is not evidence from a client product, participant or real assistive-technology execution.