A11Y-TBK-009-WORKED-001: representative worked example
Context: Representative synthetic example for TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android: Touch exploration and linear swipe equivalence on a fictional, version-frozen product target; no client or participant execution occurred.
Inspected: The tester follows S2 (Compare explore-by-touch with next/previous swipe navigation across all visible and off-screen controls) using the target, required state, tool and repeat rule stated in this procedure.
Observed output: After the tester completes the TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android: Touch exploration and linear swipe equivalence scenario named Compare explore-by-touch with next/previous swipe navigation across all visible and off-screen controls, the recorded observation for the target is inconsistent with the required result: Both methods reach meaningful controls in a logical order without inaccessible or duplicate elements.
Evidence:
- example-evidence-001: target and state record for The selected task, content and controls relevant to Touch exploration and linear swipe equivalence on the exact recorded physical device.
- example-evidence-002: contemporaneous observation from the named method — Exact displayed speech or contemporaneous transcript with gesture, focus and state.
- example-evidence-003: comparison note linking the actual observation to the expected result and claim boundary
Tester reasoning: The recorded observation does not demonstrate the expected result: Both methods reach meaningful controls in a logical order without inaccessible or duplicate elements. The failed decision is limited to this synthetic target and state; unexecuted coverage is not inferred.
Decision: failed
Finding: A11Y-TBK-009-example-finding-001 — TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android: Touch exploration and linear swipe equivalence: expected result is not demonstrated. The represented barrier may affect Blind people and others who use mobile speech output, touch exploration or sequential swipe navigation.
Remediation: Change the represented target or process so it demonstrates this result: Both methods reach meaningful controls in a logical order without inaccessible or duplicate elements. Then rerun the affected step and every dependent variation.
Reviewer feedback: The reviewer confirms applicability, environment, actual-versus-expected comparison, evidence references and bounded wording; unsupported product-wide or conformance language is removed.
Final client wording: Synthetic training finding: the sampled TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android: Touch exploration and linear swipe equivalence target does not meet the procedure expectation in the recorded state. User impact and broader scope require evidence from the buyer's real execution.
Retest: Synthetic retest example: after the represented change, repeat the failed step plus material error and recovery states. Close the finding only when new evidence demonstrates the expected result; otherwise retain the non-pass outcome.
Boundary: This is a representative, synthetic worked example for training and calibration. It is not evidence from a client product, participant or real assistive-technology execution.