TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android: Forms, instructions and errors
Generated file currentAuthoring: Content completeWhat file status means
This status reports only whether the generated procedure matches the current controlled source hash. It is not independent content verification, regulatory approval, product evidence or a conformance decision.
Recorded standards review: No optional specialist review recorded. Next review: Not scheduled.
Complete a form, trigger validation errors, recover and confirm success using real TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android.
Available formats
Use this test in the format you need
The HTML procedure includes the working worksheet. JSON provides the structured source data. Editable Markdown files are delivered inside package downloads.
Complete a form, trigger validation errors, recover and confirm success using real TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android.
What this result means: This procedure records how Complete and correct a form with TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android behaves on android-talkback-chrome. It can expose evidence relevant to WCAG 1.3.1, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3 and 4.1.2 for the tested task and environment. Use the linked conformance procedures for WCAG 1.3.1, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3 and 4.1.2 to assess the complete requirements across the declared conformance scope.
Why it matters
Detect form journeys whose labels, instructions, errors, focus or status changes are missing, misleading or unusable when using TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android. People most likely affected: blind and low-vision people using the named screen reader and browser combination. Users may enter incorrect data, be unable to find or correct errors, lose context or fail to confirm submission. In the recorded android-talkback-chrome environment, check explore-by-touch, sequential swipes, rotor or local-context navigation, gestures and focus recovery; a gesture conflict or lost virtual focus can make the current screen unusable.
When to use it
Apply when the product includes a form that must be evaluated for practical interoperability with TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android. This is a journey, not a substitute for criterion-specific WCAG testing.
Confirm before starting
Is a form journey selected and safe test data authorised?
Is real TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android available in the exact recorded environment?
Are all important success, validation, interruption, recovery and confirmation states available?
Mark it not applicable only when
The selected subject contains no form journey requiring this platform-interoperability evaluation.
Exceptions
This platform journey has no normative exception of its own. Any exception affecting a linked WCAG criterion must be evaluated in the separate criterion-specific procedure.
Reference
Supporting information
Standards and requirement mappings
W3C-WCAG22 · 1.3.1secondary · partial
This Mobile screen-reader journey observes Complete and correct a form with TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android in the recorded android-talkback-chrome environment. Use the linked WCAG 1.3.1 conformance procedure to evaluate all normative parts of WCAG 1.3.1 across the declared scope.
W3C-WCAG22 · 3.3.1secondary · partial
This Mobile screen-reader journey observes Complete and correct a form with TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android in the recorded android-talkback-chrome environment. Use the linked WCAG 3.3.1 conformance procedure to evaluate all normative parts of WCAG 3.3.1 across the declared scope.
W3C-WCAG22 · 3.3.2secondary · partial
This Mobile screen-reader journey observes Complete and correct a form with TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android in the recorded android-talkback-chrome environment. Use the linked WCAG 3.3.2 conformance procedure to evaluate all normative parts of WCAG 3.3.2 across the declared scope.
W3C-WCAG22 · 3.3.3secondary · partial
This Mobile screen-reader journey observes Complete and correct a form with TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android in the recorded android-talkback-chrome environment. Use the linked WCAG 3.3.3 conformance procedure to evaluate all normative parts of WCAG 3.3.3 across the declared scope.
W3C-WCAG22 · 4.1.2secondary · partial
This Mobile screen-reader journey observes Complete and correct a form with TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android in the recorded android-talkback-chrome environment. Use the linked WCAG 4.1.2 conformance procedure to evaluate all normative parts of WCAG 4.1.2 across the declared scope.
W3C-MOBILE · W3C-MOBILEplatform · supporting
This source does not override WCAG or create an additional WCAG conformance requirement.
This source does not override WCAG or create an additional WCAG conformance requirement.
Supporting and advisory guidance
Supporting sources are identified in the mappings and source register. They do not add conformance requirements.
Evidence specification
Environment record
Exact OS, browser, assistive-technology, physical device where applicable, settings and clean-state declaration.
Use a redacted extract or evidence reference. Do not include credentials, secrets or unnecessary personal data.
Calibration record
Fixture/version, actions, expected output and actual output.
Use a redacted extract or evidence reference. Do not include credentials, secrets or unnecessary personal data.
Assistive technology output
Displayed speech output or a contemporaneous exact transcript, gesture, accessibility focus target and orientation. for initial, error, recovery and confirmation states.
Use a redacted extract or evidence reference. Do not include credentials, secrets or unnecessary personal data.
Use a redacted extract or evidence reference. Do not include credentials, secrets or unnecessary personal data.
Responsibility record
Product, browser, OS, assistive-technology and configuration checks plus unresolved questions.
Use a redacted extract or evidence reference. Do not include credentials, secrets or unnecessary personal data.
Worked example and outcome calibration
A11Y-TBK-003-WORKED-001: representative worked example
Context: Representative synthetic example of the Civic Benefits Portal address form on Android; not a physical-device TalkBack run.
Inspected: Linear navigation, postcode entry, empty required error, rotation/recovery and confirmation.
Observed output: The representative accessibility snapshot exposes the postcode error after Submit, but the live status is ordered after footer links and the input is not identified in the message.
Evidence:
EVD-REF-010 representative accessibility snapshot
EVD-REF-011 gesture/focus sequence
EVD-REF-012 error relationship extract
Tester reasoning: The error is technically present but not timely or identifiable in the expected linear path. Real TalkBack behaviour is unverified, so execution is blocked rather than passed or failed.
Decision: blocked
Finding: FND-REF-003 — Postcode error appears after unrelated footer content. A mobile screen-reader user may not discover why submission failed.
Remediation: Place the error summary directly after the page heading or move accessibility focus to it on failed submission; identify the Postcode field and associate its inline error.
Reviewer feedback: Reviewer required the report to distinguish tree order from a real TalkBack announcement and replaced a claimed failure with a blocked execution plus a review issue.
Final client wording: Supporting inspection indicates that the postcode validation message follows unrelated footer content. Run the approved physical-device TalkBack scenario before confirming the client-facing finding.
Retest: RT-REF-004 remains blocked pending a physical Android/TalkBack run; static ordering is corrected in the representative fixed fixture.
Boundary: This is a representative, synthetic worked example for training and calibration. It is not evidence from a client product, participant or real assistive-technology execution.
Outcome calibration
Passed
The tester discovers instructions, completes the form, finds and corrects each error, recovers after interruption and confirms submission without visual assistance.
The complete journey is usable in the exact recorded TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android environment.
Failed
After invalid submission, focus moves but the screen reader announces neither an error nor the affected field, and the tester cannot locate the problem.
A validation barrier prevents independent recovery in the selected journey.
Not applicable
The selected product area contains no form journey.
No journey target matches applicability.
Cannot tell
The same field works in calibration but fails only in the product; browser and assistive-technology evidence conflict and responsibility remains unresolved.
Record the behaviour and use cantTell rather than unsupported attribution.
Not tested
The success path was completed, but validation-error and recovery states were not executed.
Required journey states remain untested.
Sampling, complete processes and platform limitations
Run each selected critical journey from start to finish, including its main error and recovery paths. Record which journeys and states were included.
If this check is part of a user journey, test the selected journey from start to finish, including relevant errors and recovery. Record any path that was not tested.
Physical-device evidence applies only to the recorded device, operating system, browser, screen-reader version and settings.
Check relevant browser, tool or assistive-technology release notes before assigning unexpected behaviour to the product.
If responsibility is unclear, record the reproducible behaviour and use cannot tell until it is resolved.
Related procedures
A11Y-WCAG-007
A11Y-WCAG-048
A11Y-WCAG-049
A11Y-WCAG-050
A11Y-WCAG-054
ACT rules and WCAG technique traceability
This is a project-authored manual procedure, not a W3C Approved ACT Rule. An ACT result can support only the part of this procedure covered by that rule. It does not replace the remaining manual or assistive-technology checks.
No supporting W3C Approved ACT Rule is selected for this procedure.
Understanding SC 1.3.1. Techniques are examples, not extra requirements. Record any technique or common failure used, but decide the result against the success criterion.
Understanding SC 3.3.1. Techniques are examples, not extra requirements. Record any technique or common failure used, but decide the result against the success criterion.
Understanding SC 3.3.2. Techniques are examples, not extra requirements. Record any technique or common failure used, but decide the result against the success criterion.
Understanding SC 3.3.3. Techniques are examples, not extra requirements. Record any technique or common failure used, but decide the result against the success criterion.
Understanding SC 4.1.2. Techniques are examples, not extra requirements. Record any technique or common failure used, but decide the result against the success criterion.
Review history and source register
2026.08.27-rc.9 — Reworked for plain language, case-focused steps, scoped evidence and transparent draft review status.
2026.08.27-rc.9 — Migrated to professional catalogue schema v3 with separated outcomes, structured authority, applicability, evidence, decision and review records.
2026.08.27-rc.9 — Specialist procedure mapped to its task family and current first-party platform guidance and checked for internal consistency; competent review and real execution remain separate.
2026.08.27-rc.9 — Replaced migrated boilerplate with a case-specific reference implementation and completed generated-file integrity review.
2026.08.27-rc.9 — Rewritten as an atomic professional-delivery flagship with component effort guidance and a complete representative worked example.
2026.08.27-rc.9 — Procedure guidance and presentation simplified without changing draft governance status.
Review decision: pending. Open issues: No real TalkBack with Chrome on physical Android execution has been performed or claimed. A registered real-platform adapter must execute the calibration and journey, followed by a distinct competent review, before platform coverage can be recorded.; The linked WCAG criteria remain secondary partial mappings and require separate atomic or criterion-level assessment.