A11Y-JAWS-001-WORKED-001: representative worked example
Context: Representative synthetic example for JAWS with Chrome or Edge: Page orientation and structure on a fictional, version-frozen product target; no client or participant execution occurred.
Inspected: The tester follows S2 (Use continuous reading, headings and landmark navigation to understand the page and reach main content) using the target, required state, tool and repeat rule stated in this procedure.
Observed output: After the tester completes the JAWS with Chrome or Edge: Page orientation and structure scenario named Use continuous reading, headings and landmark navigation to understand the page and reach main content, the recorded observation for the target is inconsistent with the required result: Title, language, headings, landmarks and reading sequence provide an accurate mental model.
Evidence:
- example-evidence-001: target and state record for The selected task, content and controls relevant to Page orientation and structure in the exact recorded desktop environment.
- example-evidence-002: contemporaneous observation from the named method — Exact announcement or speech-history/caption extract with command, cursor/focus and state.
- example-evidence-003: comparison note linking the actual observation to the expected result and claim boundary
Tester reasoning: The recorded observation does not demonstrate the expected result: Title, language, headings, landmarks and reading sequence provide an accurate mental model. The failed decision is limited to this synthetic target and state; unexecuted coverage is not inferred.
Decision: failed
Finding: A11Y-JAWS-001-example-finding-001 — JAWS with Chrome or Edge: Page orientation and structure: expected result is not demonstrated. The represented barrier may affect Blind people and others who use speech output, screen-reader navigation or a virtual cursor.
Remediation: Change the represented target or process so it demonstrates this result: Title, language, headings, landmarks and reading sequence provide an accurate mental model. Then rerun the affected step and every dependent variation.
Reviewer feedback: The reviewer confirms applicability, environment, actual-versus-expected comparison, evidence references and bounded wording; unsupported product-wide or conformance language is removed.
Final client wording: Synthetic training finding: the sampled JAWS with Chrome or Edge: Page orientation and structure target does not meet the procedure expectation in the recorded state. User impact and broader scope require evidence from the buyer's real execution.
Retest: Synthetic retest example: after the represented change, repeat the failed step plus material error and recovery states. Close the finding only when new evidence demonstrates the expected result; otherwise retain the non-pass outcome.
Boundary: This is a representative, synthetic worked example for training and calibration. It is not evidence from a client product, participant or real assistive-technology execution.