A11Y-MOTION-002-WORKED-001: representative worked example
Context: Representative synthetic example for Reduced motion toggled during session on a fictional, version-frozen product target; no client or participant execution occurred.
Inspected: The tester follows S2 (Record OS, browser, OS motion preference and application state) using the target, required state, tool and repeat rule stated in this procedure.
Observed output: After the tester completes the Reduced motion toggled during session scenario named Record OS, browser, OS motion preference and application state, the recorded observation for the target is inconsistent with the required result: The actual user preference and baseline are reproducible.
Evidence:
- example-evidence-001: target and state record for Each selected animation, transition, movement and interaction relevant to Reduced motion toggled during session.
- example-evidence-002: contemporaneous observation from the named method — Before/after recording or frame/timing evidence for the exact motion and task state.
- example-evidence-003: comparison note linking the actual observation to the expected result and claim boundary
Tester reasoning: The recorded observation does not demonstrate the expected result: The actual user preference and baseline are reproducible. The failed decision is limited to this synthetic target and state; unexecuted coverage is not inferred.
Decision: failed
Finding: A11Y-MOTION-002-example-finding-001 — Reduced motion toggled during session: expected result is not demonstrated. The represented barrier may affect People with vestibular disorders, motion sensitivity, attention-related disabilities or seizure disorders.
Remediation: Change the represented target or process so it demonstrates this result: The actual user preference and baseline are reproducible. Then rerun the affected step and every dependent variation.
Reviewer feedback: The reviewer confirms applicability, environment, actual-versus-expected comparison, evidence references and bounded wording; unsupported product-wide or conformance language is removed.
Final client wording: Synthetic training finding: the sampled Reduced motion toggled during session target does not meet the procedure expectation in the recorded state. User impact and broader scope require evidence from the buyer's real execution.
Retest: Synthetic retest example: after the represented change, repeat the failed step plus material error and recovery states. Close the finding only when new evidence demonstrates the expected result; otherwise retain the non-pass outcome.
Boundary: This is a representative, synthetic worked example for training and calibration. It is not evidence from a client product, participant or real assistive-technology execution.