A11Y-KBD-002-WORKED-001: representative worked example
Context: Representative synthetic example for Logical focus order on a fictional, version-frozen product target; no client or participant execution occurred.
Inspected: The tester follows S2 (Record the focus sequence through the critical journey, including responsive menus, validation and conditional content) using the target, required state, tool and repeat rule stated in this procedure.
Observed output: After the tester completes the Logical focus order scenario named Record the focus sequence through the critical journey, including responsive menus, validation and conditional content, the recorded observation for the target is inconsistent with the required result: The sequence follows task meaning and does not jump unpredictably.
Evidence:
- example-evidence-001: target and state record for Each selected function, component and complete-process state relevant to Logical focus order.
- example-evidence-002: contemporaneous observation from the named method — Exact keys, focus sequence, target identity and state. Save the focus sequence, keystrokes, outcome and evidence; record any pointer intervention as a failure or blocked execution.
- example-evidence-003: comparison note linking the actual observation to the expected result and claim boundary
Tester reasoning: The recorded observation does not demonstrate the expected result: The sequence follows task meaning and does not jump unpredictably. The failed decision is limited to this synthetic target and state; unexecuted coverage is not inferred.
Decision: failed
Finding: A11Y-KBD-002-example-finding-001 — Logical focus order: expected result is not demonstrated. The represented barrier may affect People who use a keyboard, switch device, keyboard emulator or other sequential input.
Remediation: Change the represented target or process so it demonstrates this result: The sequence follows task meaning and does not jump unpredictably. Then rerun the affected step and every dependent variation.
Reviewer feedback: The reviewer confirms applicability, environment, actual-versus-expected comparison, evidence references and bounded wording; unsupported product-wide or conformance language is removed.
Final client wording: Synthetic training finding: the sampled Logical focus order target does not meet the procedure expectation in the recorded state. User impact and broader scope require evidence from the buyer's real execution.
Retest: Synthetic retest example: after the represented change, repeat the failed step plus material error and recovery states. Close the finding only when new evidence demonstrates the expected result; otherwise retain the non-pass outcome.
Boundary: This is a representative, synthetic worked example for training and calibration. It is not evidence from a client product, participant or real assistive-technology execution.